If you are looking for a wedding photographer, it is likely that soon here the words: medium format, 35mm and digital. These are the three main types of camera systems currently used by wedding photographers. We have a wedding photographer has been with us years ago, on what camera system is better managed. The purpose of this article is to provide information about these types of camera systems and the possible impact on your wedding she sharesThe decision of the photographers.
Medium Format
For many years, the average size has grown to be absolutely the best choice. A medium format camera uses film, 3 times bigger than a 35mm negative – leading to a higher resolution and extensions fine, but the cameras and processing costs are very expensive.
Primary advantages: high resolution negatives. So far, the fact is that a person in possession of a medium format camera was almost a per seSign that this was a real "wedding photographer" (because of the cost of the system).
Disadvantages: expensive (to keep film costs are so high, that some wedding photos lost book helps photographers of medium-format photographs) limit; film may be lost or damaged during processing, attention, and operate slowly.
35 millimeters
For many years 35 millimeters has a bad reputation for the provision of poor quality it has come – especially compared toMedium format. But over the past 10 years, the quality of 35mm film greatly improved. Now is a common format for many professional photographers, particularly those using the road and shoot photojournalistic close to a thousand or more images used for a wedding.
Main advantages of 35mm:) fast (fast, easy and shoot fire, significantly improved the quality of the extensions (many people find it difficult to distinguish the difference between a 35mm and medium format8×10 extension).
Disadvantages: film is always more expensive, and the film may be damaged or lost during processing .. Many photographers who shoot films have been acquired in the negative, so that the files have become a digital file.
Digital
Professional digital wedding photography is a viable solution since around 2000 (although some argue that term). The quality of digital cameras has now reached a pointwhere many photographers feel the beats rivals in quality or even medium format negatives. Used, in fact, many digital wedding photographer to take medium format.
Primary advantages of digital (instant review of images on the back of the camera, no film and processing costs, even if the additional time-saving information necessary to process digital images, offset); greater control over the images (eg, a light rotation or cropping an image quickly and easily withdigital, but requires a custom print size of 35 mm or medium format cameras).
Disadvantages: the rapid technological progress over time and the cameras will soon be obsolete (although this does not necessarily apply, since the consumer). Memory cards are easier than rolls of film to lose (if you use the wedding photographer a digital camera, ask them how to ensure that the photos are safe again) in the study.
Summary:
No matter what you say – can be all three formatsa valid method for wedding photography. Some may be more expensive than others but all can get good results. Many photographers use multiple camera systems. Some might use the format for the medium term Formals, but 35mm for the reception and ceremony coverage. Others are primarily shoot digital, but can bring film cameras as a backup device.
My advice to future brides: before signing a contract with a photographer trying to ask magnificationthat with the same equipment that would be used for your wedding, have been taken. If you are the quality and color of pictures, does not really matter if 35mm, digital or medium format camera was used to take the picture!
0